« AZ: we don't want your stinkin' Great Lakes water | Main | a whistle blower's tale from MN »

July 22, 2007

when is an outright prohibition, not?

Granholm said the outright ban on diversions in the compact "sends a message nationally" that the region intends to protect its resource.

Back up 2 paragraphs:

Despite such reassurances, Michigan lawmakers will soon take up water legislation that ratifies a 2004 compact by the Great Lakes states, Ontario and Quebec to ban the diversion of Great Lakes water out of the basin. The only exception to that rule is bottled water in containers of less than five gallons. [Correction: that's actually less than 5.7 gallons, which as one friend said, is a pretty big sippy-cup. Particularly when multiplied by thousands of truckloads or trainloads.]

There are more exceptions:

-- for communities that straddle the Great Lakes Basin watershed;
-- for communities in counties that straddle the Great Lakes Basin watershed.


 

In fairness to Governor Granholm, the term "outright" is a paraphrase; and it may be the reporter's word and assumption.

http://www.mlive.com/news/statewide/index.ssf?/base/news-8/1185052210249070.xml&coll=1

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1089161/20256798

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference when is an outright prohibition, not?:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In