Cold, Clear and Deadly
It's not often that a book comes along that can make some Great Lakes industries and environmentalists both uncomfortable. But it's good when one does! Michigan author Mel Visser, a longtime environmental manager at what used to be known as the Upjohn Company, has written a powerful book about the threat posed by global use of persistent organic chemicals. This week we'll interview him about the reception his book has received from interest groups and policymakers.
The book is a fascinating journey through one Great Lakes Basin resident's life, career and conscience. To read more on the book or order a copy: http://msupress.msu.edu/bookTemplate.php?bookID=3156
How much progress are you making in getting the Great Lakes community to listen to your case for POPs
elimination? Are you satisfied with that progress? Why or why not?
Progress is slow because the message is so counterintuitive. I’m saying that “Thinking Globally and Acting Locally,” dredging sediments, and strict adherence to the Water Quality Agreement will not have any effect upon the horrendous toxaphene contamination of Lake Superior, our most POPs contaminated Great Lake. Progress is satisfying in that my conclusions have been embraced by scientific experts, and several individuals and groups have stepped forward to help me spread the word. It feels good to be on a right track with positive support.
It strikes me that your thesis conflicts with the dogma of both the industrial and environmental sectors. Is that true, and are any people within either sector listening?
By following industrial dogma,
we produced POP after POP in the 50s and 60s and exported them to Asia
I do get scary responses from non
listening dogmatic conservatives and environmentalists. “Look what happened
when DDT was banned, millions of people died,” and “I believe in solving
problems by acting locally.” Fortunately, I’m finding people realizing that we
have had decades without progress, that we are on a mistaken path, and we must
work together.
Comments