« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 23, 2007

green rankings of states by Forbes

Vermont is first on Forbes magazine's "America's Greenest States" list, which was released Monday. No surprise there. But New Jersey No. 7 out of 50?

As for Minnesota, the "above average" state kept to its reputation and is ranked 15th, the best of any state in the Upper Midwest. Wisconsin is 16th, South Dakota 21st, Iowa 35th and North Dakota 42nd.

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/1500575.html

Michigan is 24th...A bit about our methodology--we ranked each state in six equally weighted categories: carbon footprint, air quality, water quality, hazardous waste management, policy initiatives and energy consumption.

http://www.forbes.com/businessinthebeltway/2007/10/16/environment-energy-vermont-biz-beltway-cx_bw_mm_1017greenstates_2.htm
l

October 22, 2007

tornado over Black Lake, Michigan

A beautiful if terrifying photo.

http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=834&tstamp=200710

clean water trend

A report on 2002 water quality recently released without fanfare by EPA finds that:

* 45% of the nation's rivers fail to meet water quality standards, up from 39% in 2000.

* 47% of lakes fail to meet standards, up from 45%.

* 17% of shoreline miles fail to meet standards, up from 14%.

* 91% of Great Lakes shoreline miles fail to meet standards, up from 78%.

http://www.epa.gov/305b/ (click on 2002 report).

clean water restoration

U.S. Reps. Oberstar and Dingell co-authored an opinion piece that clearly spells out what's at stake in House consideration of the Clean Water Restoration Act, H.R. 2421. This is especially critical for the Great Lakes states. But there will continue to be those who ignore the last section of the bill, which clearly spells out continuing existing exemptions from the Act for farming and other activities, and try to wave the tattered flag of 'federal power grab.' It's unlikely over 30 states would have opposed the Bush Administration's repeal by decree of 2003 if they felt Uncle Sam was usurping their authority.

Contrary to what some would have you believe, Congress intended the Clean Water Act's protection to extend to all waters and wetlands, including tributaries that flow only intermittently and do not have a continuous surface connection. Congress' intent to protect wetlands that are isolated and not adjacent to open waters arose from very practical considerations: It is far easier and more cost-effective to control pollution at the source rather than to address its impacts downstream. Navigability was not the goal of the Clean Water Act -- preventing pollution was.

Opponents of the Clean Water Act want to maintain the uncertainties of water protections and reopen the debate on the scope of the Clean Water Act, which places valuable water resources at risk. We strongly disagree.

http://www.startribune.com/commentary/story/1496175.html

October 21, 2007

the vast unknown: how much Lake Michigan pollution

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency still has not determined how much pollution goes into Lake Michigan, despite a request from U.S. Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.

In a 43-page response to Durbin's questions released to the Post-Tribune, the EPA states that because of limitations with the database that contains monitoring reports from the major facilities, the agency has not tried to calculate how much of each pollutant is discharged into Lake Michigan overall.

http://www.post-trib.com/news/613239,eparesponse.article

October 20, 2007

Michigan Gov. Granholm: what do you stand for?

In 2002 the conservation and environmental community of Michigan had reason to hope. After 12 years of rolling back, caving in and catering to the state's pollution lobby under Governor John Engler, the state might have a new governor who would think beyond the next news cycle to the next generation.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm was elected after making it clear she would take a far different conservation path than Engler.

Now, in year five of the Granholm Administration, a couple of nationally significant conservation decisions are pending. Will the Governor of Michigan stand aside for or assist in the plundering of the western Upper Peninsula for a few years of nickel mining, at great risk to Lake Superior and wild lands?
Will the Governor of Michigan stand aside for or assist in the siting of coal-fired power plants that will continue us all on the path toward destructive climate change?

Or will the Governor of Michigan, like a handful before her (Warner, Green, Williams, and Milliken) stand up for what makes the land of two peninsulas great? A lot more than her legacy is riding on the answer.

Coal power opposition forces in (coal-mining) West grow

That's encouraging. But this New York Times article also predicts that in 23 years even more of our electricity will come from coal than today. And the anti-coal power forces in the Midwest, especially Michigan, seem only now to be gathering strength.

The Talking Heads had a song about this:  Burning Down the House. Except that song was fun and this is real.

GREAT FALLS, Mont. — Richard D. Liebert turned his back against a hard wind the other day, adjusted his black cap and gazed across golden fields of hay. Explaining why he is against construction of a big coal-burning power plant east of town, Liebert sounded like one more voice from the green movement.

“The more I learn about global warming and watch the drought affect ranchers and farmers, I see that it’s wind energy, not coal plants, that can help with rural economic development. Besides, do we want to roll the dice with the one planet we’ve got?”

But Mr. Liebert, despite his sentiments, fits nobody’s stereotype of an environmentalist. He is a Republican, a cattle rancher and a retired Army lieutenant colonel who travels to South Korea to train soldiers to fight in Iraq.

He is also an example of a rising phenomenon in the West. An increasingly vocal, potent and widespread anti-coal movement is developing here. Environmental groups that have long opposed new power plants are being joined by ranchers, farmers, retired homeowners, ski resort operators and even religious groups.

Activists say the increasing diversity of these coalitions is making them more effective.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/20/business/20coal.html?hp

October 19, 2007

Michigan DEQ must deny Kennecott mining permit

After yesterday's comprehensive and sharply critical expert review commissioned by the National Wildlife Federation of the proposed Kennecott Company nickel mine in the western U.P., doubts about the mine are peaking. Michigan DEQ simply cannot credibly grant the permit to mine at this point. The company's assertions are not enough basis for risking this amazing backwoods/headwaters area.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071019/mi_kennecott_mine.html?.v=1

Gore: "left-wing nut"?

Hey, if you can't beat 'em, insult 'em.

TV meteorologist Karl Spring’s characterization of former Vice President Al Gore as a “left-wing nut” has taken on a life of its own in the blogosphere.

Spring, chief meteorologist at KBJR-TV, Channel 6 — the Northland’s News Center — made the comment on a local radio show the day Gore’s co-selection for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize was announced.

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/articles/index.cfm?id=52568&section=None

October 18, 2007

happy 35th, Clean Water Act

The Clean Water Restoration Act is needed to properly celebrate today’s anniversary of the original Clean Water Act. We in Minnesota are lucky to have strong leadership on this issue from U.S. Reps. Oberstar, Keith Ellison and Betty McCollum. All members of Minnesota’s congressional delegation are needed to support this simple but vital legislation.

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/articles/index.cfm?id=52457&section=Opinion