Having heard that the children's Christmas book Santa Claus Goes Green had ignited a little protest campaign from the right, I ordered a copy, read it, and found it mild in content and strikingly well-illustrated. What's the big fuss about? Well, one passage in the text implies that melting glaciers are impairing polar bear habitat; and melting sea ice is in fact the problem for polar bears. This minor imperfection (melting ice is associated with climate change, and is related to polar bear population issues) serves as justification for an Amazon reviewer attack on the whole book. Sample comment:
Great, let's raise a new legion of the Hitler youth, except this time
it's the religion of global warming. Pay no mind to the fact that 1934
was the hottest year on record and that global temps have held steady
or declined over the past 10 years while CO2 emissions have only
increased. Let your kids make up their own minds by using FACTS rather
than preaching your own twisted political ideology. Anyone who
purchases this garbage should be punched in the face.
Exquisitely well-reasoned, eh? Since when did recycling and energy efficiency (the steps Santa Claus takes to become more green) threaten the American way of life?
It's disheartening, if not disturbing to see how embittered the anti-climate change crowd has become. The book doesn't indoctrinate; it suggests ways we can live more sustainably on the planet even if climate change doesn't concern you.