« Thanks, but we're going ahead anyway as planned | Main | Federal v. state control »

August 30, 2009


Gary Wilson

So why should Waukesha settle for less?

..the applicant admits the huge amount of water approved for withdrawal is to support future sprawl which is inconsistent with state law:

"We put in the extra gallons to plan for future use, for what happens over the next 30 years as we develop the economy around here."

The comments to this entry are closed.